<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird Discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2007/07/26/thunderbird-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2007/07/26/thunderbird-discussion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2007/07/26/thunderbird-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/?p=144#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Interesting subject, I think there are many innnovations that will determine the direction of browsers over the coming years, and it seems mozilla is leading the way. Incorporating emails, music, and usb devices will be the browsers of the future.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting subject, I think there are many innnovations that will determine the direction of browsers over the coming years, and it seems mozilla is leading the way. Incorporating emails, music, and usb devices will be the browsers of the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vienna22</title>
		<link>http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2007/07/26/thunderbird-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>vienna22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/?p=144#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Since there are some powerfull plugins (like &#039;lightning&#039;, &#039;enigmail&#039;) Thunderbird has become more than a alternative to Outlook and Co.

I can not say how you should do it but PLEASE let TB stay alive!

Thanks a lot to all developers of Thunderbird and its Addons

Best wishes from Vienna, Austria
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since there are some powerfull plugins (like &#8216;lightning&#8217;, &#8216;enigmail&#8217;) Thunderbird has become more than a alternative to Outlook and Co.</p>
<p>I can not say how you should do it but PLEASE let TB stay alive!</p>
<p>Thanks a lot to all developers of Thunderbird and its Addons</p>
<p>Best wishes from Vienna, Austria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2007/07/26/thunderbird-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 06:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/?p=144#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Jim, as I understand it, there are a few engineers working on the Eudora parts of Thunderbird and they&#039;ll continue to do so under the Penelope project just as Scott, David, and the Thunderbird community will continue to work on the core mail features.

- A
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, as I understand it, there are a few engineers working on the Eudora parts of Thunderbird and they&#8217;ll continue to do so under the Penelope project just as Scott, David, and the Thunderbird community will continue to work on the core mail features.</p>
<p>- A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2007/07/26/thunderbird-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/?p=144#comment-258</guid>
		<description>I wonder how this affects the development of Eudora.  Weren&#039;t all future versions of that client, with a still-pretty-significant install base, supposed to be based on Thunderbird?

Seems like this is a real chance for Qualcomm to get involved in an exciting open source movement with a lot of momentum behind it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how this affects the development of Eudora.  Weren&#8217;t all future versions of that client, with a still-pretty-significant install base, supposed to be based on Thunderbird?</p>
<p>Seems like this is a real chance for Qualcomm to get involved in an exciting open source movement with a lot of momentum behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbjayme</title>
		<link>http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2007/07/26/thunderbird-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>nbjayme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/?p=144#comment-257</guid>
		<description>While I am sad that Mozilla is dropping continued development on ThunderBird I would assume that they are refocusing their strengths to make Mozilla a very compelling application framework/platform (i.e. Xul). There&#039;s really a need to improve the framework and ease of development in creating plugins and/or integration with other scripting languages. The future is about web-enabled applications and the web-browser (Firefox) is an important tool to that. This is not to say that thunderbird is unimportant, but it is unlikely to become a host environment for a web application.

Likewise, it&#039;s good to hear that there are brave souls who are willing to move ThunderBird forward. I hope the community will continue to support the developers. Most of our clients have now switched to ThunderBird, and the improvement in the Mozilla framework will also be beneficial to ThunderBird.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am sad that Mozilla is dropping continued development on ThunderBird I would assume that they are refocusing their strengths to make Mozilla a very compelling application framework/platform (i.e. Xul). There&#8217;s really a need to improve the framework and ease of development in creating plugins and/or integration with other scripting languages. The future is about web-enabled applications and the web-browser (Firefox) is an important tool to that. This is not to say that thunderbird is unimportant, but it is unlikely to become a host environment for a web application.</p>
<p>Likewise, it&#8217;s good to hear that there are brave souls who are willing to move ThunderBird forward. I hope the community will continue to support the developers. Most of our clients have now switched to ThunderBird, and the improvement in the Mozilla framework will also be beneficial to ThunderBird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

