Comments on: Principles for an Open Transition http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/12/02/principles-for-an-open-transition/ Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:18:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: John O’Duinn’s Soapbox » “Yesterday, December 7th…” http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/12/02/principles-for-an-open-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-4698 John O’Duinn’s Soapbox » “Yesterday, December 7th…” Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:13:28 +0000 http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/?p=587#comment-4698 [...] to the public, not just owned by just a different private commercial company. The work that Mitchell and John Lilly have been doing here with Creative Commons licensing is literally history in the [...] [...] to the public, not just owned by just a different private commercial company. The work that Mitchell and John Lilly have been doing here with Creative Commons licensing is literally history in the [...]

]]> By: Anonymous Coward http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/12/02/principles-for-an-open-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-4651 Anonymous Coward Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:45:34 +0000 http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/?p=587#comment-4651 Where was the discussion on who would be (to take a recent example) the Incubator Repository owner / peers? There was discussion about getting some, not who. Any discussion with Module Ownership module peers were closed. I have no problem with the people actually selected; I think they will do great. I have a problem with the fact that there was no discussion who they would be before they were named. That's not transparency. Where was the discussion on who would be (to take a recent example) the Incubator Repository owner / peers? There was discussion about getting some, not who. Any discussion with Module Ownership module peers were closed.

I have no problem with the people actually selected; I think they will do great. I have a problem with the fact that there was no discussion who they would be before they were named. That’s not transparency.

]]>