Some examples of what this might mean in practice summarized below from the earlier post.
- Option to download other browsers must be presented when a user is updating IE or Windows.
- IE may not become the default browser except in specified legitimate circumstances.
- Windows must ship with alternative browsers installed and offer users a choice.
- Windows must ship with a mechanism for downloading and installing a user’s browser choice.
- Windows may not include a browser (”untying” required).
Another way of thinking about this is : How much distribution advantage can Windows provide to IE? If one answers “as much as Microsoft wants with no limits” then this principle wouldn’t be implemented. If one answers “Windows can’t provide any distribution advantage to IE” then one would likely end up supporting a remedy that requires Windows to install a browser separately, based on a consumer’s decisions. If one answers “some” then one look to a of “must carry” remedy; a remedy that has been reported as of interest to the EC. Or one might look to some of the other options listed above.
One complication is the balance between encouraging competition and encouraging ease-of-use for the consumer. One might believe that a monopoly product like Windows should not provide any distribution advantage to IE, and yet simultaneously question whether an operating system without a web browser makes sense. Intellectually the principle might be right, but the remedy hard on consumers. I suspect many in the Mozilla world find ourselves looking at this dilemma.
Another complication is Microsoft’s long history and impact within the computer industry. Some of us have lived with Microsoft’s dominance for many cycles of the industry. To this group, the newer participants who believe Microsoft is a reasonable company that behaves within normal parameters are naive. To the new participants, the old-timers are weighted down by history and baggage and don’t see today clearly. It’s difficult to cross this divide.
One thing is clear. The ubiquity of Windows has meant the ubiquity of IE. As a result, millions of people believe that the blue “e” icon on their desktop IS the Internet. Changing that is a long, hard job. And until we do we magnify the difficulty of bringing competition to the browser space.
Gijs said on March 19th, 2009 at 9:21 am:
Alan said on March 19th, 2009 at 10:30 am:
Eric said on March 19th, 2009 at 10:57 am:
adam g said on March 19th, 2009 at 3:58 pm:
Eddy Nigg said on March 19th, 2009 at 5:43 pm:
mitchell said on March 19th, 2009 at 9:36 pm:
mitchell said on March 19th, 2009 at 9:44 pm:
mitchell said on March 19th, 2009 at 9:49 pm:
Dwayne Bailey said on March 19th, 2009 at 10:21 pm:
foo said on March 20th, 2009 at 6:23 am:
TriniKrusader said on April 6th, 2009 at 5:11 am:
tsahi said on April 10th, 2009 at 10:32 am:
Asa Dotzler said on April 11th, 2009 at 11:19 am: