Ubuntu recently included a patch that causes an End User License Agreement for Firefox to appear. This has caused great concern on several topics. One is the content of the agreement. Another is the presentation. A third is whether there’s any reason for a license at all.
The most important thing here is to acknowledge that yes, the content of the license agreement is wrong. The correct content is clear that the code is governed by FLOSS licenses, not the typical end user license agreement language that is in the current version. We created a license that points to the FLOSS licenses, but we’ve made a giant error in not getting this to Ubuntu, other distributors, and posted publicly for review. We’ll correct this asap.
Second, the way the license is presented to people also has issues. I think the presentation might not be so bad if we had the correct content there, so that it said the software is governed by the FLOSS licenses that are so important to us. But even then the presentation may have issues. We’re certainly trying to figure this out. We’ll do this with public input; you’ll see posts about this shortly as well.
There’s a third question of services, and whether the FLOSS license for the code can include the services one accesses. We think this isn’t true all the time, and the license will reflect that. The code is governed by FLOSS licenses, and we should have been clear about that.
This leaves the question of whether it ever makes sense to show people the terms that relate to the software and services available to them. I saw some comments asking why one ever needs any terms. Again, if we had the correct content I think this would be less of an issue because then we would be telling people about FLOSS licenses. We (meaning Mozilla) have shot ourselves in the foot here given the old, wrong content. So I hope we can have a discussion on this point, but I doubt we’ll have a good one until we fix the other problems.
We take this very seriously and are working hard to fix it.
Update: text of the revised license is online.
Pingback from Firefox with EULA-screen in next Ubuntu? (Update) | Robert Penz Blog
Pingback from Mozilla no pudo con Ubuntu — Criando Cuervos
Pingback from The Ubuntu community challenges the Firefox EULA - Mozilla Links
Pingback from Does Mozilla hate Ubuntu users? « I’m Just an Avatar
Pingback from Mozilla exige a Ubuntu incorporar una EULA a Firefox « Conocimiento Libre (o lo que está detrás del Software Libre)
Trackback from onli blogging
Pingback from Mozilla korrigiert EULA | Linux Nachrichten - News und Meldungen rund um Linux / Open Source
Pingback from Diedas Ubun2 Weblog » Firefox EULA in Ubuntu 8.10
Trackback from Tu Linux
Trackback from This Site Was Social Bookmarked at Tutable.com
Pingback from Gandalf: Mozilla a EULA | Dokumentacje
Pingback from Neuer Wind über die Mozilla EULA « Keksdose
Pingback from inportb » Blog Archive » Ubuntu Users: Skip Firefox; Use ABrowser Instead
Pingback from Mozilla、Firefoxの利用許諾を見直し - PJNN今日のスーパーニュース速報
Pingback from Firefox 3.0.2 - rock stable | F!XMBR
Pingback from tecosystems » Friday Grab Bag
Pingback from Programas Livres | PROGRAMAS LIVRES
Pingback from Mozilla Firefox 3.05 Updates User Rights | Technology Computers, Internet and Personal Tech News
Pingback from kev – about:rights in Firefox 3.0.5